Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third-party website or material prepared by a third party.
- ENERGY
- PRECIOUS METALS
- BASE METALS
- AGRICULTURAL
- SOFTS
- Alternative Energy
- STRATEGIC/RARE EARTH METALS
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
-
D’Agostino: Gold Physical Sales Still Up 50%; Gold ETFs Shake Out Leveraged Speculators
-
Peter Schiff: Gold Fools Shouldn’t Be Selling
-
Gold ETF ‘GLD’ Sees Its Biggest & First Inflow In 2 Months
-
Week In Review: Gold Pullback Toward $1,322 Begins, NatGas Tests First Layer Of Support, Oil Falls, Copper Rises
-
Gold’s Large Market Size & Liquidity Keep It Less Volatile Than Silver, But Maybe Not For Long
***Top stories from the last 15 days
- Written by Brad Zigler |
- October 28, 2010
Oil Market Begs To Be Shorted—Modestly
- Details
Sometimes you just have to deal with limitations. For example, with interest rates as low as they are, you're not likely to make big bucks off your deposit account. But the trade-off is, of course, the certainty of getting your principal back. So you accept a limited reward for a limited risk.
Bearish investors now seek a similar trade-off in the oil market as they consider put spreads.
Put options are contracts that afford their purchasers the opportunity to sell assets at a certain price, no matter what their prevailing market value. Sellers of puts undertake the obligation to buy the contract's underlying asset upon exercise.
A put spread entails the simultaneous purchase and sale of similar option contracts. In the current environment, vertical spreads—or those for which only the strike prices of the puts differ—have become particularly attractive. More specifically, bearish spreads.
For a put spread to have bearish pay-off characteristics, the contract with the higher strike price must be purchased while a lower-struck put is sold. The higher-struck put will invariably be the more expensive, so the transaction will result in a net debit, meaning more premium is paid out than received.
Debit spreads make sense now because the volatility assumption priced into oil options is relatively low. In the chart below, take a look at the red line, which represents the CBOE Oil Volatility Index. This index measures 30-day volatility expectations in a panoply of United States Oil Fund (NYSE Arca: USO) options.
WTI Spot Vs. Oil Volatility Index

Presently, the index reading is 32.00, which represents an annualized volatility of 32 percent. It's not the cheapest these options have been, but it's certainly not the most expensive, either. That high watermark was 100.42, set in December 2008; the low point was a December 2007 reading of 24.67.
Buying a put spread is a bearish play, albeit a moderate one. If you expect a modest decline in the price of the USO ETF, then a bear put spread works well for a low volatility environment.
The fund's trading at the $35 level now, so nearby strike prices would be $34 and $33. A last look at the December contracts showed a $34 put offered at $1.07 a share and a 75-cent bid for a $33 contract. Given USO's recent lows in the $31-$32 range, these puts would make a sensible spread.
- Prev
- 1
- 2
- | Full Article |
- Next >>
- Week In Review: Gold Attempts To Form Double Bottom, Oil & Copper Retreat, NatGas Spikes Higher
- Morning Call: Gold Stalls Near $1,390 Ahead Of Holiday, Brent Oil May Fall Below $95 Says Bank Of America
- Commodity ETF Flows: Gold Drags Down Flows
- Market Wrap: Gold Nears $1,400 Again As Dollar Plunges, NatGas Advances, Copper Sags
- Morning Call: Gold Rallies, Oil Sinks After Bearish China Data, 7% Plunge In Japanese Stocks; NatGas Steadies