Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third-party website or material prepared by a third party.
- ENERGY
- PRECIOUS METALS
- BASE METALS
- AGRICULTURAL
- SOFTS
- Alternative Energy
- STRATEGIC/RARE EARTH METALS
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES
-
Short-Term Gold Bull Case Gains Strength Amid ETF Stabilization, Reaction To Jobs Data Will Be Telling
-
The Commodity Investor: China Becoming Most Important Factor In Global Gold Markets
-
World Gold Council's Artigas: Expanding Gold Holdings Could Add Huge Demand, Mine Production Stagnant
-
NatGas Prices Plunge 4%, At Risk Of Breakdown After Huge Inventory Build
-
Gold Price Pressure Grows As Silver Breaks Down, Central Banks May Buy Less As Bond Yields Rise To 14-Month Highs
***Top stories from the last 15 days
- Written by Tom Butcher |
- July 31, 2012
‘Conflict Minerals’ Gold, Tin & Tungsten Face New Layer Of Regulation
- Details
Dodd-Frank Act seeks to cut funding of armed groups engaged in conflict and human rights abuses through disclosure rule.
Question: What do columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold and wolframite have in common?
Answer: They, and their derivatives, are “conflict minerals” in the context of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enacted in July 2010. (For those less geologically minded: Tantalum comes from coltan, tin comes from cassiterite and tungsten from wolframite.)
Whatever else Dodd-Frank may be, it is certainly long—849 pages. Only on the 839th page do you encounter “SEC. 1502. CONFLICT MINERALS.,” with the entire section, and issue, wrapped up in just six pages.
But for the SEC, tasked with framing the relevant rules, the wording in those few pages appears to have echoed ominously the brevity of Fermat’s Last Theorem, and what the mathematician famously claimed: “I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain.”
That theorem took over 350 years to prove, and the proof by Andrew Wiles is longer than 100 pages. With a proposed rule of more than 100 pages back in mid-December 2010, after two years, the SEC has still not come up with the final rule. We have recently been informed however that a vote will be taken on Aug. 22. We wait—still.
Why “SEC. 1502. CONFLICT MINERALS”?
Tacked on to the end of Dodd-Frank, and described succinctly in LG Electronics’ Statement on Conflict Minerals, “The goal of the act [in this section anyway] is to cut direct and indirect funding of armed groups engaged in conflict and human rights abuses.”
The conflict and human rights abuses targeted are those currently occurring in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)—formerly Zaire—particularly in the provinces of North and South Kivu and in the Ituri district of the Orientale province, and adjoining countries.

Source: GAO: CONFLICT MINERALS DISCLOSURE RULE
The funding targeted is that currently derived from the sale of gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten, and “any other mineral or its derivatives determined by the Secretary of State to be financing conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country.”
- Morning Call: Gold & Silver Rise Ahead Of Fed Statement, Bernanke Testimony; WTI Oil Hits 9-Month High
- Market Wrap: Gold Falls Sharply Ahead Of Fed Decision; Oil Rises Back Near Multimonth Highs
- Morning Call: Gold & Silver Fall As Fed Countdown Begins, Inflation Remains Low; Oil & Gas Advance
- Contango Report: Corn Roll Yields Above 50%, But Attractive Returns Far From A Given
- Market Wrap: Gold Retreats After After SocGen Calls For Plunge To $1,200; Oil Steadies Amid Middle East Conflict