HAI

Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third party website or material prepared by a third party.

Features and Interviews

   |
Poor Nothing special Worth watching Pretty cool Awesome! 2 Ratings
Rate this article
Ground Beef
Written by Julian Murdoch   
March 07, 2008 1:51 PM EST

 

Ah, the good old days. It seems like just last June, the U.S. top meat producers were Cargill, Tyson, Swift, National Beef Packing and Smithfield Beef. Not exactly brand names in the minds of consumers, but since the last wave of consolidation in the '80s and '90s (where the top-four meat-producing companies went from handling 36% of all cattle slaughter operations to controlling 78% of the market), it's at least been stable.

But then Brazil's JBS started its buying spree. In June last year, Latin America's largest beef producer gobbled up Swift & Co., the United States' third-largest beef processing company. Not only did this get them a foothold in the U.S., it made them the world's largest meat producer overnight - ahead of Tyson and Cargill. And it looks like the big will just keep getting bigger. This week, JBS announced its intentions to buy National Beef Packing Co., as well as the beef processing and cattle feeding operation arm of Smithfield Foods Inc.

Ginormous deals like this are never a foregone conclusion, and there are mixed feelings on how this consolidation is going to affect the market. The Bull Bulls believe that it will be good in the short term because the beef processors will still need to compete for cattle. The Cow Bears believe this is putting too much of the industry under one company's control - especially since the Smithfield deal includes its share of Five Rivers Ranch Cattle Feeding, the world's largest cattle feeding company. This potential consolidation comes as the profit margins of meatpackers have been squeezed because of the tight cattle supplies and lower production.

And for the futures market?

If you're just dipping your toe in the water, you first need to understand the different contracts: Live Cattle and Feeder Cattle. The difference is simple: how big your cow is, and where he lives. To qualify for the Live Cattle contract, Bessie has to be somewhere from a calf to about 600 to 800 pounds. Once that little guy hits that target weight, he gets sent off to the feedlot. Once at feedlots, cattle are classified as Feeder Cattle. Feeder cattle stay in feedlots for about three to five months while being fed corn and other grains to bring their weight to an average of 1,250 pounds at slaughter time.

These two contracts have very different seasonal cycles:

 

Feeder Cattle Weekly Prices

Feeder Cattle Weekly Prices

Live Cattle, Weekly Prices

Live Cattle, Weekly Prices

But even without this seasonality, livestock prices have remained relatively flat while other "soft" commodities have seen huge increases in the past few years. So what's really moving prices?



 

 
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter 
First Comment

Comments (0)



Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 


Terms of Use
The HardAssetsInvestor.com message board and comment features are designed to facilitate thoughtful discussion of the biggest issues impacting commodity investors. All comments should be respectful. Insults and profanity are not permitted. The editor reserves the right to remove comments at his/her discretion.

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • Is Meat A Hard Asset?
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 2.4% Most people don't think of meat as a hard asset.
    February 09, 2010
  • What’s Wrong With DBA’s Picture?
    How have DBA's recent composition tweaks affected the fund's recent trajectory? Equities beat futures in 2009How DBA's lineup has changedWhy future backwardation isn't a given
    January 19, 2010
  • Got Your NIBs?
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 3.0% The holidays may be over, but don't put away those special cocoa mugs yet.
    January 14, 2010
  • Invert Sugar: A Trading Recipe
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 1.7% Serious foodies know that invert sugar, a mixture of glucose and fructose, is sweeter than the sucrose from which it is derived; traders know how to sweeten profits when the sugar market inverts.
    December 29, 2009
  • Whither Commodity Stock Funds?
    Of the various ways you can invest in commodities, which did best over the past year? Should you have bought MOO, DBA or stock?How momentum is shiftingCould futures-based funds soon overtake equity-funds?
    December 03, 2009
 

Commodities Data

February 09, 2010 01:05 PM EST

  Loading data ...
 

Weekly Commodities Poll

Which do you think is more effective with commodities?

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • Is Meat A Hard Asset?
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 2.4% Most people don't think of meat as a hard asset.
    February 09, 2010
  • What’s Wrong With DBA’s Picture?
    How have DBA's recent composition tweaks affected the fund's recent trajectory? Equities beat futures in 2009How DBA's lineup has changedWhy future backwardation isn't a given
    January 19, 2010
  • Got Your NIBs?
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 3.0% The holidays may be over, but don't put away those special cocoa mugs yet.
    January 14, 2010
  • Invert Sugar: A Trading Recipe
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 1.7% Serious foodies know that invert sugar, a mixture of glucose and fructose, is sweeter than the sucrose from which it is derived; traders know how to sweeten profits when the sugar market inverts.
    December 29, 2009
  • Whither Commodity Stock Funds?
    Of the various ways you can invest in commodities, which did best over the past year? Should you have bought MOO, DBA or stock?How momentum is shiftingCould futures-based funds soon overtake equity-funds?
    December 03, 2009
 

Seminal Papers »