HAI

Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third party website or material prepared by a third party.

Features and Interviews

  
Poor Nothing special Worth watching Pretty cool Awesome! 30 Ratings
Rate this article
Gold In Backwardation? Not So Fast ...
Written by Brad Zigler   
Tuesday, 25 November 2008 18:04

 

There was a lot of excitement among gold aficionados last week. A $34-an-ounce end-of-week rally did a lot to brighten their spirits. Monday's $28 follow-through punched spot COMEX gold above the $800/ounce mark for the first time since October 20.

Gold rallied because ... because ... well, just what was the reason?

Some among the chattering classes would have us believe the spike was foretold by gold tipping into what they dubbed "backwardation." Well, not gold per se. Rather, gold forward rates.

Backwardation? Forward rates?

Maybe a little explanation's in order.

Backwardation, as described in several Hard Assets Investor articles (see "The Battle Against Contango" for one), exists when the price of a commodity for immediate delivery is higher than its price for later delivery. For a storable commodity like gold, backwardation implies scarcity of supply. Ordinarily, COMEX gold is a carrying charge market - sometimes ascribed as a "contango" market - in which contracts for later delivery are priced higher than spot to reflect the costs of storage. Because gold isn't consumed and supply is so visible, there's usually enough metal to carry forward.

Forward rates are the interest charges levied by dealing banks for borrowing gold. These rates are calculated for various maturities on a swap basis against U.S. dollars. A brief explanation of forwards can be found in "Gold Liquidity Play A Setup?").

Normally, the forward market looks like any other yield curve, with near-term rates lower than those of longer maturities. Those rates, too, are ordinarily positive. What was noted as backwardation last week was the quotation of negative forward rates in the London dealer market for one- and two-month gold loans.

That sent the discussion boards buzzing. "Does this mean banks will pay us for borrowing gold?" asked more than one denizen.

Don't you wish.

 

Gold Forward Rates

 

Sense can be made of negative forward rates once you understand how the metal is traded in the lease market. Just as changes in supply and demand affect metal prices, so too do changes in borrowing demand and lending affect lease rates. If gold is readily available, lease rates will be low; if the supply of borrowable metal is tight, rates will rise accordingly. Remember, though, we're talking about gold in the lease market here, not the cash metal marketplace.



 

More on this topic (What's this?)
The Five Best Ways to Invest in Gold Today
Is Gold Finally Breaking Out?
Three Big Pieces of News for Gold Investors
Read more on Investing In Gold, Backwardation at Wikinvest
 
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter 

Comments (6)

 Thursday, 27 November 2008 9:05 EST - Posted by Momo

 
I'm not sure I fully understand your arguments. The lease rate as of Nov 20th has to be calculated using the formula LIBOR - GOFO = 1.4 - (-0.08) = 1.48 and not 1.32 as you mention in the article. Furthermore, it is the GOFO rate which needs to be considered when deriving the gold forward price. Consequently, the forward price is in backwardation when the GOFO rate becomes negative.

 Friday, 28 November 2008 9:53 EST - Posted by Nikhil

 
I agree with Momo's point , shouldnt the net rate one earns by borrowing and selling it be LIBOR - GOFO = 1.4 - (-0.08) = 1.48 (assuming I invest the cash proceeds from selling gold, and get Libor on that cash deposit)? Please confirm

And I infer that there are also two opposing forces on gold prices:
1. Low gold forward rates putting downward pressure: Implying that there are institutions willing to lend gold and there is easy availability.
2. Historical -ve fwd rates implying a possible upmove: though I dont think this is a strong point, since there can be lots of external factors affecting gold price. In sep 99 gold didnt rally. It went from 300 to 325 in the short term (oct 99) but ended the year at 288. Secondly in Mar 01 again there was an immediate rally and infact gold moved up more when Spx moved down in those recessionary days.

Hence I dont whether to read this as a +ve or -ve for the gold prices? Though I might lean towards -ve prices in the short term since I think the first point mentinoed above is more logical.

 Friday, 28 November 2008 15:03 EST - Posted by Brad Zigler

 
Ah...typos, typos.

Yes, the number signs got confubulated along the way. The math's been repaired.

Important to note that the pervasive backwardation earlier this year (that is, inversion along the whole forward curve) was associated with falling prices.

 Tuesday, 09 December 2008 19:06 EST - Posted by Bron Suchecki

 
Brad the article still says that “Forward rates are the interest charges levied by dealing banks for borrowing gold.” According to the LBMA’s “A Guide to the London Bullion Market”, GOFO is LIBOR minus Lease Rate. As someone who works in the precious metals business, I can tell you that you don't borrow gold at GOFO rate but at Lease Rates.

Therefore when discussing your chart titled “Gold Lease Market”, which has a red GOFO and blue LIBOR, you statement that the “chart above illustrates that the gold "carry trade" has become more profitable as the financial markets melt down” is totally incorrect. The spread between LIBOR and GOFO is the Lease Rate (ie the actual cost of borrowing gold outright). The red GOFO line is actually the “spread” or “carry trade” indicator and it has been going down, meaning it is less profitable to short gold.

On thing I will agree partly with you on is "you're better off looking at other fundamental and technical signals for buying cues". As I discuss in my blog on this topic goldchat.blogspot.com/... there is not strong correlation between GOFO and the price. However, this is not to say one should ignore GOFO, but it should be used along with other signals to understand what is going on in the gold market.

 Tuesday, 09 December 2008 23:36 EST - Posted by Brad Zigler

 
It's a matter of perspective. YOU may not borrow at GOFO; that's the rate at which central banks (not secondary or bullion banks) are dealing. What's illustrated is gold's utility from the central bank perspective as tool to stimulate loan demand.

 Sunday, 14 December 2008 20:34 EST - Posted by Bron Suchecki

 
Brad, it is not a matter of perspective. You borrow gold at the Lease Rate, sell it and invest the cash at LIBOR. Therefore the profit on this carry trade is LIBOR minus the Lease Rate, ie GOFO.

Looking at GOFO rates at the LBMA website, they have declined from around 4% early this year to 0.2% currently. Therefore the gold "carry trade" has become less profitable, not more profitable as you claim.

If the carry trade (or short selling, or lending on the swap, all the same thing) has become less profitable, then your statement "goes a long way to explain why gold didn't reach new highs during the crisis" does not make any sense.



Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters
*
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 


Terms of Use
The HardAssetsInvestor.com message board and comment features are designed to facilitate thoughtful discussion of the biggest issues impacting commodity investors. All comments should be respectful. Insults and profanity are not permitted. The editor reserves the right to remove comments at his/her discretion.

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

Commodities Data

January 05, 2009 11:44 PM EDT

Gold Monthly OHLC
  Loading data ...
 

Weekly Commodities Poll

Given the recent events in the stock markets, should investors increase or decrease their commodities allocations, or leave their portfolios alone?

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

 

Seminal Papers »