HAI

Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third party website or material prepared by a third party.

Features and Interviews

   |
Poor Nothing special Worth watching Pretty cool Awesome!
Rate this article
Rethinking Sugar
Written by Julian Murdoch   
November 13, 2008 11:07 AM EST

 

Why are Jim Rogers, and so many others (including Kevin Kerr in this week's podcast), hot for sugar?

It's a matter of history.

If you look back (way back), sugar is relatively cheap right now. In 1980, the average price for London refined sugar (No. 5) was a whopping 32.30 cents a pound. In October of that year, it hit an average of 42.30 cents per pound. That is a far cry from sugar's October 2008's average price of 15.07 cents a pound. Adjust for inflation and those numbers are off the charts.

 

Source: USDA Sugar data released 11/3/08

 

The same is true in the U.S. The London refined sugar contract is based on the London daily spot price for refined sugar f.o.b. (free on board) ships in European ports, and is typically derived from sugar beets. The U.S. version is raw cane sugar, quoted as Sugar #11 on the New York Board of Trade, where the contract is linked to the bulk spot price for sugar in Caribbean ports (including Brazil). The USDA has Sugar #11 averaging around 10.01 cents a pound this decade, while the London #5 averaged 12.30 cents a pound during the same time period.

That's the long view, but what has it done for us lately? Looking at the Sugar #11 contract on the NYBOT, it doesn't take a chartist to see sugar in a flat trading range between $0.10 and $0.15 a pound for the past year. But the interesting thing to note is that in the past year, while the S&P 500 has dropped about 39%, sugar has actually gained 19%.

 

 

Source: EODData

 

Why? In a phrase: supply and demand.

According to data from the "USDA's World Sugar Situation" (May 2008), sugar consumption has been growing steadily since the mid-1990s. This shouldn't be a surprise to any follower of commodities. The drivers are all the same: As Asian economies move up the per-capital income ladder drive, people demand more refined foodstuffs - meat, coffee, sugar, etc. This big trend has been supplemented by a slow shift away from high-fructose corn syrup in favor of actual sugar in the food industry, driven by the spiraling and volatile price of core. While the food industry could switch back someday, the economic drivers would need to be fairly strong.



 

 
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter 
First Comment

Comments (0)



Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 


Terms of Use
The HardAssetsInvestor.com message board and comment features are designed to facilitate thoughtful discussion of the biggest issues impacting commodity investors. All comments should be respectful. Insults and profanity are not permitted. The editor reserves the right to remove comments at his/her discretion.

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • What’s Wrong With DBA’s Picture?
    How have DBA's recent composition tweaks affected the fund's recent trajectory? Equities beat futures in 2009How DBA's lineup has changedWhy future backwardation isn't a given
    January 19, 2010
  • Got Your NIBs?
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 3.0% The holidays may be over, but don't put away those special cocoa mugs yet.
    January 14, 2010
  • Invert Sugar: A Trading Recipe
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 1.7% Serious foodies know that invert sugar, a mixture of glucose and fructose, is sweeter than the sucrose from which it is derived; traders know how to sweeten profits when the sugar market inverts.
    December 29, 2009
  • Whither Commodity Stock Funds?
    Of the various ways you can invest in commodities, which did best over the past year? Should you have bought MOO, DBA or stock?How momentum is shiftingCould futures-based funds soon overtake equity-funds?
    December 03, 2009
  • Jim Rogers: Long Sugar, But Getting Short Bonds
    The commodities expert shares his opinions on regulatory issues, the energy markets and the U.S.
    October 20, 2009
 

Commodities Data

February 09, 2010 10:36 AM EST

  Loading data ...
 

Weekly Commodities Poll

Which do you think is more effective with commodities?

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • What’s Wrong With DBA’s Picture?
    How have DBA's recent composition tweaks affected the fund's recent trajectory? Equities beat futures in 2009How DBA's lineup has changedWhy future backwardation isn't a given
    January 19, 2010
  • Got Your NIBs?
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 3.0% The holidays may be over, but don't put away those special cocoa mugs yet.
    January 14, 2010
  • Invert Sugar: A Trading Recipe
    Real-time Monetary Inflation (last 12 months): 1.7% Serious foodies know that invert sugar, a mixture of glucose and fructose, is sweeter than the sucrose from which it is derived; traders know how to sweeten profits when the sugar market inverts.
    December 29, 2009
  • Whither Commodity Stock Funds?
    Of the various ways you can invest in commodities, which did best over the past year? Should you have bought MOO, DBA or stock?How momentum is shiftingCould futures-based funds soon overtake equity-funds?
    December 03, 2009
  • Jim Rogers: Long Sugar, But Getting Short Bonds
    The commodities expert shares his opinions on regulatory issues, the energy markets and the U.S.
    October 20, 2009
 

Seminal Papers »