HAI

Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third party website or material prepared by a third party.

Features and Interviews

   |
Poor Nothing special Worth watching Pretty cool Awesome! 1 Ratings
Rate this article
Rethinking Uranium
Written by Julian Murdoch   
January 29, 2009 10:58 AM EST

 

Nuclear energy – say what you will about all of the problems associated with it – does have the advantage of being a carbon-emissions-free energy source, as good or better than solar and wind power. From a pure climate change and air quality perspective, nuclear is pretty green.

But is nuclear energy going to play a larger role in electricity generation in the future? It is hard to tell. President Obama's recent signings of executive orders aimed at moving the country toward energy independence and addressing the issue of climate change made no explicit mention of nuclear's possible role, though many believe his appointment of Energy Secretary Steven Chu – a Nobel Prize-winning physicist who talked favorably about nuclear power during his confirmation hearings – speaks volumes.

Despite this potential pro-nuke policy stance, however, uranium – the commodity investor's play on a nuclear resurgence – has been ailing. What gives?

 

Uranium Price Performance

As we've covered now and then here at HardAssetsInvestor.com, while there is a market price for uranium, it is not traded like oil with a futures market that everyone can participate in. Uranium prices are determined (for public consumption) by the public information arising from private contracts between producers and suppliers. The prices that come from these transactions make up the "market" price that companies use as a benchmark for their own transactions. In this regard, it shares much in common with some other big industrial inputs, like iron ore and coking coal.

Compared with its historical stagnation, uranium ran up like crazy in the past year, going from around the $10 per pound mark to an all-time high of around $140. Current prices are a more modest $48 a pound as of January 26.

 

Ux U3O8 vs. 30-Week Moving Average Prices

 

How can we explain this wild ride?

Demand is steady – as of November 2008, there were 439 nuclear reactors in operation, and that number hasn't changed much in some time. The industry is expanding a little – as of October 2008, there were 38 reactors under construction worldwide (stats here) – but most of those reactors are still years away from coming on line. For the most part, the excitement of 2007 seems to be just that ... excitement ... driven by expectations of a wave of new nuclear construction projects.

 

Supply Paradox

The prospect of new construction gets uranium investors excited because the uranium market is in a chronic situation of undersupply. The chart below comes from TradeTech, another uranium consulting group.

 

World Uranium Production & Requirements

 

The gap in supply is made up for from old stockpiles and retired nuclear weapons. Some believe that any increased demand could tip the balance, and that there might not be enough supply to meet demand. Hopes (or fears) of that kind of scenario drove the spike in prices last year.

 

Ux U3O8 Prices

 



 

 
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter 
First Comment

Comments (0)



Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 


Terms of Use
The HardAssetsInvestor.com message board and comment features are designed to facilitate thoughtful discussion of the biggest issues impacting commodity investors. All comments should be respectful. Insults and profanity are not permitted. The editor reserves the right to remove comments at his/her discretion.

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • Rethinking Uranium
    Uranium is living in a constant state of undersupply, so how could the price be falling? The rise and fallSupply paradoxThe Russian connection
    January 29, 2009
  • A Real Commodity Moneymaker
    Real-time Inflation Indicator (per annum): 9.2% Wednesday's column ("2008 Was Golden ...
    January 08, 2009
  • Oil Guesses Wrong Again And A Worrying Contango
    Real-time Inflation Indicator (per annum): 7.9% According to the U.S.
    November 26, 2008
  • Oil Prices Going Lower … Much Lower
    Fadel Gheit, managing director of oil and gas research at Oppenheimer, predicts oil prices will drop precipitously over the next 6-12 months.
    September 24, 2008
  • An Interview With Robert Dehollander
    The environmental-engineer-turned-CFP talks to HAI about new developments in alternative energy, and how those might play in investors' portfolios.
    July 30, 2008
 

Commodities Data

March 12, 2010 02:28 AM EST

  Loading data ...
 

Weekly Commodities Poll

Is now a good time to buy gold?

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • Rethinking Uranium
    Uranium is living in a constant state of undersupply, so how could the price be falling? The rise and fallSupply paradoxThe Russian connection
    January 29, 2009
  • A Real Commodity Moneymaker
    Real-time Inflation Indicator (per annum): 9.2% Wednesday's column ("2008 Was Golden ...
    January 08, 2009
  • Oil Guesses Wrong Again And A Worrying Contango
    Real-time Inflation Indicator (per annum): 7.9% According to the U.S.
    November 26, 2008
  • Oil Prices Going Lower … Much Lower
    Fadel Gheit, managing director of oil and gas research at Oppenheimer, predicts oil prices will drop precipitously over the next 6-12 months.
    September 24, 2008
  • An Interview With Robert Dehollander
    The environmental-engineer-turned-CFP talks to HAI about new developments in alternative energy, and how those might play in investors' portfolios.
    July 30, 2008
 

Seminal Papers »