HAI

Unless otherwise indicated, the material below has not been prepared by Van Eck Associates Corporation or HardAssetsInvestor.com.
Neither assumes any liability for any content on a third party website or material prepared by a third party.

Features and Interviews

   |
Poor Nothing special Worth watching Pretty cool Awesome! 2 Ratings
Rate this article
No Gas For You
Written by Julian Murdoch   
January 15, 2009 10:36 AM EST

 

As you may have heard, Russia's Gazprom (OTC:OGZPY) cut off the flow of natural gas into Ukraine at the beginning of January. Since natural gas is such a localized market, it could be tempting to write off the news as a local concern-but we live in a global economy, and a shortage in one country can have far-reaching ripple effects.

Here's the background:

Russia has the natural gas, but for it to get that gas to its customers, it has to pipe the gas through Ukraine, and a lot of it. In an average year, 300 million cubic meters flows through Ukraine and on to the rest of Europe. For this partnership to work, Russia has been charging Ukraine lower-than-average rates for the gas it uses domestically compared with what the rest of Europe pays. In 2008, that amount was $179.50 per 1,000 cubic meters, as compared with the average $500 for European countries. In return, Ukraine charges Russia lower tariffs than it might for the transport of natural gas across its country.

It's an uneasy partnership, and they've been grumpy neighbors over time (2006 in particular was contentious). At the end of December, the two countries were in negotiations, and according to an article in the New York Times, the negotiating gap between the two countries was only about $50. At least, that's where things were at the end of 2008.

2009 dawned and Gazprom upped its selling price to Ukraine to $418 per 1,000 cubic meters, a huge increase of $238.50 per 1,000 cubic meters. Happy New Year Ukraine!

Needless to say, Ukraine wasn't at all thrilled. Things escalated and Gazprom decided to turn off the spigot.

From a pure kid-in-the-sandbox perspective, if someone won't play with you, you take your marbles and go home. But in this instance, stopping the gas flow is a double-edged sword, and Gazprom is getting bit badly, even as countries beyond Ukraine feel the cold.

 

Gazprom And Russia

In some ways, Gazprom is Russia and Russia is Gazprom. The line between the state-owned company and the government of Russia is blurry, complicated by the fact that the current president of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, was formerly Gazprom's chairman, and the Russian government holds a 50% stake in the company.

The company is primarily involved in exporting natural gas to Europe and fulfilling domestic demand at subsidized rates. Gazprom is the world's largest natural gas producer, responsible for 85% of Russia's gas production. (They also have their fingers in lots of pies at home, including Telecommunications and Russia's banks.) Gazprom opened to foreign investment in 2006. In the past year, the stock price has followed a pattern similar to the rest of the Energy sector.

 

 

It's one thing for an independent company to be feeling the pain of low energy prices, but when the government itself needs more than $70 a barrel to meet its budget obligations (as Russia and many analysts have said), the recent commodity slide has hurt - a lot. Taxes on Gazprom, all by themselves, make up 20% of the Russian budget.

On Wednesday, President Dmitry Medvedev revealed that Gazprom has lost $1.1 billion so far because of the dispute. According to Forbes, 58% of Gazprom's gas revenues come from its European customers, although that makes up only 25% of its actual volume. This means that it is critical for the gas to flow to those European customers.



 

 
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter 
First Comment

Comments (0)



Post a Comment

Comment
(Limit 2,000
characters) 
*
Name: *
E-mail: *
Home page:

(optional)

Type in the displayed characters
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 


Terms of Use
The HardAssetsInvestor.com message board and comment features are designed to facilitate thoughtful discussion of the biggest issues impacting commodity investors. All comments should be respectful. Insults and profanity are not permitted. The editor reserves the right to remove comments at his/her discretion.

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • March Madness In Natural Gas
    Natural gas is in a seasonal upswing—but how does the long-term picture look? Should investors bet on seasonality?How contango has eaten into returnsWhy more supply has meant less contango
    March 09, 2010
  • Energy ETFs: The Tracking Problem
    Investors often use energy ETFs as proxies for the energy markets, but how well do these funds really track their underlying commodities? The problem with futures-based fundsWhy you can't use USO and UNG as direct proxiesDoes the 12-month solution work?
    February 23, 2010
  • John Woods: Crude Oil To Retrace
    The VP of McNamara Options shares his current outlook on the petroleum markets.How much do hedge funds move a market?A new bull move, or trading action?Natural gas as transportation fuel—just a pipedream?
    February 03, 2010
  • The Best Way To Play Gas M&A?
    With Exxon's acquisition of natural gas producer XTO Energy making headlines, editors Dave Nadig, Matt Hougan and Lara Crigger discuss whether ETFs are really the best way to play the natural gas M&A theme.
    December 22, 2009
  • Elliott Gue: How Investors Can Play Energy MLPs
    The editor of MLP Profits shares his outlook on where this overlooked asset class is headed in 2010.  The benefits of MLPs in a portfolio  Which sectors he has his eye on right now Is there more upside for 2010? 
    December 18, 2009
 

Commodities Data

March 16, 2010 12:06 AM EST

  Loading data ...
 

Weekly Commodities Poll

Is now a good time to buy gold?

 

Related Articles »

Did you like this article? Then you may be interested in:

  • March Madness In Natural Gas
    Natural gas is in a seasonal upswing—but how does the long-term picture look? Should investors bet on seasonality?How contango has eaten into returnsWhy more supply has meant less contango
    March 09, 2010
  • Energy ETFs: The Tracking Problem
    Investors often use energy ETFs as proxies for the energy markets, but how well do these funds really track their underlying commodities? The problem with futures-based fundsWhy you can't use USO and UNG as direct proxiesDoes the 12-month solution work?
    February 23, 2010
  • John Woods: Crude Oil To Retrace
    The VP of McNamara Options shares his current outlook on the petroleum markets.How much do hedge funds move a market?A new bull move, or trading action?Natural gas as transportation fuel—just a pipedream?
    February 03, 2010
  • The Best Way To Play Gas M&A?
    With Exxon's acquisition of natural gas producer XTO Energy making headlines, editors Dave Nadig, Matt Hougan and Lara Crigger discuss whether ETFs are really the best way to play the natural gas M&A theme.
    December 22, 2009
  • Elliott Gue: How Investors Can Play Energy MLPs
    The editor of MLP Profits shares his outlook on where this overlooked asset class is headed in 2010.  The benefits of MLPs in a portfolio  Which sectors he has his eye on right now Is there more upside for 2010? 
    December 18, 2009
 

Seminal Papers »